7/19/2009

NASA Offers Proof Apollo 11 Not A Hoax

Nasa Offers Proof Moon Landing Was Not A Hoax
Nasa Offers Proof Moon Landing Was Not A Hoax
Today marks the 40th anniversary of the famed Apollo 11 (July 20th 1969) moon landing where astronaut Neil Armstrong took one giant leap for Mankind. That leap not only unified the world but touched off a conspiracy theory almost as large as the Kennedy Assassination. The crux of the conspiracy are supposed fake photos leading many to believe that the United States never landed on the moon but instead staged the landing on an elaborate Hollywood type movie set.

To add even more fuel to this conspiracy, NASA admitted this week that the original films of the historic landing have gone missing. No wait, not missing, erased and reused for some other mission. Cost savings was listed as the reason yet NASA continues to purchase $500 dollar hammers. See the logic.

The Grassy Knoll Institute believes we really did go to the moon and return safely back home, but the evidence NASA just released as proof is very week. The photo above supposedly shows the Lunar module, astronaut foot prints, and tools and equipment left behind from previous Apollo missions. To me, it looks like absolutely nothing.

NASA, you can do better. You can take a snap shot from space of a license plate. I'm sure you can snap a photo that shows a little more detail of the moon landing sites. Unless of course we never did go there.

BTW, the shadow of the lunar module seems to be reflecting opposite of the other objects in the photo.



LURKING ON THE GRASSY KNOLL

23 comments:

  1. I agree. That is just lousy proof. You can't make out one single thing depicted in that picture. I don't see foot prints, or tools, or the lander. You would think the real rocket scientists would present better evidence. This just fueled the fire.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The reason NASA is unwilling to post high resolution images is because they would reveal my legion of death army massing on the dark side of the moon. The time is at hand mortals.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Its a hoax. If man were meant to fly he would be born with wings. Stop all this nonsense about man flying let alone in space and to the moon.

    ReplyDelete
  4. LMAO. This is the best nasa can do? Really? Seriously? What do they have as camera's that take such lousy pictures? Get a grip nasa.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hey, we're real rocket scientists too.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I thought your base was on the planet Uranus?

    ReplyDelete
  7. You are right Gonzo. You are right. Such nonsense man flying around the heavens. Almost like Chariots of the Gods.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Perhaps it is the best they want to do. Perhaps they have more to hide.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I was expecting alot more fanfare with the 40th anniversay. Not much about it off the internet.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Well you have to give credit to the writers of.. "One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind." Creativity at it's best.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I got a story one better. It is an old Internet story that spread like crazy back in the mid 1990's when the net was just exploding. It goes something like this....

    On July 20, 1969, commander of the Apollo 11 Lunar Module, Neil Armstrong was the first person to set foot on the moon. His first words after stepping on the moon, "That’s one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind", were televised to Earth and heard by millions. But just before he re-entered the lander, he made this enigmatic remark:

    "Good luck, Mr. Gorsky." Many people at NASA thought it was a casual remark concerning some rival Soviet Cosmonaut. However, upon checking, there was no Gorsky in either the Russian or American space programs. Over the years many people questioned Armstrong as to what the "Good luck Mr. Gorsky" statement meant, but Armstrong always just smiled. On July 5, 1995, in Tampa Bay, Florida, while answering questions following a speech, a reporter brought up the 26 year old question to Armstrong. This time he finally responded. Mr. Gorsky had died and so Neil Armstrong felt he could answer the question.

    In 1938 when he was a kid in a small Midwest town, he was playing baseball with a friend in the backyard. His friend hit a fly ball, which landed in his neighbor’s yard by the bedroom windows. His neighbors were Mr. and Mrs. Gorsky.

    As he leaned down to pick up the ball, young Armstrong heard Mrs. Gorsky shouting at Mr. Gorsky. "Sex! You want sex?! You’ll get sex when the kid next door walks on the moon!"

    ReplyDelete
  12. I agree. Not much on the big tube, just more an Internet thing. Sad really.

    ReplyDelete
  13. The moon landing's a hoax, and everybody knows it. Also, the world's flat and the fucking Illuminati are working with the Jews to take over the world's finance system.

    ReplyDelete
  14. That is by far the worst evidence provided by NASA. What footprints? What lander? What equipment?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Exactly Max. You would have thought that after 40 years, they would have installed a better camera than a Kodak instant camera.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Upon studying the picture NASA released, I noticed the shadow alignment of the meteor impact craters to the lunar module shadow. All the shadows appear on the left side except for the lunar modules shadow that appears on the right. Why is that?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Exactly Abe. You would think NASA would release empirical evidence leaving no room for doubt. And yet, they offer this.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Some of the transcripts of the mission have been declassified but sadly they sound like the three stooges. Much of the conversation is about using the cameras. In fact NASA provided them with a list of which cameras to use for each view and whether to use color or black and white.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Three astronauts, three Stooges. Nyuk Nyuk Nyuk.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Conspiracy Spark8/26/2009 5:03 AM

    That is a feeble attempt to discredit the conspiracy that man never landed on the moon. In fact, to me, it added more fuel to the fire that it was a hoax.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Agreed on the poor quality photo. You would think NASA could provide better. There are budget cuts though. :D

    ReplyDelete
  22. Michael Smith11/17/2009 4:11 AM

    I think you are misinterpreting the shadows. The circular areas are craters. The dark side of the crater indicates the source of light is from the left in the picture -- which is confirmed by the light seen on the right side of the craters. This is why the LEM's shadow falls to the right.

    ReplyDelete
  23. again, this is the best NASA can offer?

    ReplyDelete

Entertain Me With Your Wealth Of Worthless Knowledge