10/18/2007

Apollo Moon Hoax

moon hoax

The 60's. A very turbulent time in our history. President Kennedy was assassinated. His brother Bobby killed while campaigning for the presidency. Martin Luther King shot to death at a rally. The height of the Vietnam war, Woodstock. The Cuban Missile Crisis. Peace, Love, and rock and roll. The Cold War. And a race to land a man on the moon between the Soviets and the United States. A race fueled by a pledge from JFK to land a man on the moon by the turn of the decade. In July of 1969, the United States had won the space race and Neil Armstrong took that one long leap for mankind.

Or did he?......Was the moon landing and Apollo program a mass Government conspiracy to fool the American public and the world to prove that American technology and know how was second to none?

The Grassy Knoll Institute thinks not....Sure we all saw the FOX special on TV and were led to believe that the entire moon landing was done on a giant set created with the lavishness of Hollywood. The set was supposedly located somewhere in Nevada and the astronauts were shuttled in and out on a daily basis while they practiced their lines and routines. So, here we are, all the hoopla of the media talking of the Apollo launch and that Americans will be the first to reach the moon, and not one photo was taken of the astronauts on the shuttle bus going to and fro to the moon set? Not once has anyone of the thousands of people involved produced hard evidence of the hoax? Not one of the hundreds of officials has come clean and announced it was a hoax? Never once were any photos of the studio stage ever published. Why? Because there are none.
moom hoax 2

Moving on to the photos on the moon. The conspiracy theorists say they were doctored. This Photo shows the flag in the foreground, an astronaut saluting in the back, and the LEM lander. But where are the stars? There are no stars in the sky. Why? Well, any photographer will tell you that pointing the lens towards the sun blocks out the back ground and any stars would be to dim to show up against the suns contrast.

moon 03

This Photo begs the question, what are those two bright light blobs on the left? Are they spotlights to illuminate the landscape to get better pictures? Again, any photographer will tell you that all photos are never perfect and that at times, imperfections occur. Sometimes the film gets over exposed, and splotches appear on the film. Take a look at your own family album and I'm sure you will find several over exposed photos.

moon 4

This Photo shows that the photographer was above their target. Was he on a platform high above to get a good shot? Of course not. The moons surface is not flat. There are hills and peaks and crevices on the moon. You can see that the subject astronaut is standing in a depression and that the astronaut taking the photo was simply standing on a higher surface plane.

Let us also realize that these men were astronauts, not photographers, and also had a very cumbersome space suit to deal with when snapping pictures. Not every photo will come out perfect. Some should be out of focus, overexposed, and cropped badly.

In closing, not a single shred of hard evidence has ever been disclosed. Ever. Not one interview or press announcement by NASA or the Government.

The Grassy Knoll Institute believes that Neil Armstrong really did fly to the moon in the Apollo space rocket and that he did take that historic step on the moon in 1969.



LURKING ON THE GRASSY KNOLL

5 comments:

  1. IT IS NOT FOR THE PUBLIC TO DISPROVE THE GOV'T CLAIMS....... IT IS FOR THE GOV'T TO PROVE THEIR OWN CASE. AND THIS HAS NOT BEEN DONE. THE ASTRONAUTS MADE DEEP FOOTPRINTS IN THE MOON'S SURFACE, WE'RE TOLD, THOUGH THE LANDING CRAFT MADE NONE AT ALL. IF ARMSTRONG FIRST SET FOOT ON THE MOON, THEN WHO TOOK THE PHOTO OF HIM FROM OUTSIDE THE CRAFT? AND, YES, THERE REALLY SHOULD HAVE BEEN A CANOPY OF STARS OVER THEM, SOMETHING WHICH IS HARD TO FAKE ON A MOVIE SET. NO PROOF OF A HOAX EXISTS? WHAT HARD PROOF EXISTS THAT THE TRIPS ACTUALLY TOOK PLACE? THE OFFICIAL VERSION HAS BECOME A BELIEF SYSTEM, AND THERE ARE SOME OF OF US WHO ARE PURE ATHEISTS ON THE SUBJECT.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The first photos of Armstrong stepping onto the moon was from a camera attached to the lander. The arm stretched out and shot him descending.

    ReplyDelete
  3. HELLO, LOTGK. THAT COMMENT ON THE 'CAMERA ATTACHED TO THE LANDER' IS MORE THAN THE GOV'T HAS TOLD US. *WHY DID THE ASTRONAUTS LEAVE FOOTPRINTS WHILE THE LANDER DID NOT? WHY WAS THERE NO BLAST CRATER UNDER THE LANDER? WHY WAS ONLY A SMALL CRESCENT OF THE SURROUNDING TERRAIN CAUGHT ON FILM? WHY NOT DO A FULL 360-SWEEP? HOW DID THEY MANAGE A PHOTO OF THE LANDER BLASTING OFF? WHAT ABOUT THE STARS IN THE SKIES, SUCH AS ASTRONOMERS HAVE SAID THERE SHOULD HAVE BEEN, AND SOMETHING WE CAN PARTIALLY SIMULATE BY GETTING OUT OF THE CITY TO A RURAL AREA AND LOOKING UPWARD? WHY WAS THE MOON, AS SEEN FROM THE MOON, OUT OF PROPER PROPORTION? WHATEVER BECAME OF THE 'MOON ROCKS' WE HEARD SO MUCH ABOUT? WHAT BECAME OF THE SAMPLES OF 'MOON DUST' WE HEARD SO MUCH ABOUT? ###AND WHY HAVE EVERY ONE OF THE ASTRONAUTS WHO ALLEGEDLY WENT TO THE MOON NOW BEEN SILENCED AND REFUSE TO GIVE INTERVIEWS OR SPEAK ON ANY SUBJECT WHATEVER? WHY HAVE THEY ALL BECOME RECLUSIVE? WHY IS IT THAT VIRGIL GRISSOM AND OTHERS WERE KILLED IN A FIRE IN A FLIGHT SIMULATOR SO CONVENIENTLY AFTER THEY LOUDLY COMPLAINED ABOUT SAFETY FACTORS WHICH NASA DIDN'T WANT TO BOTHER WITH? AGAIN, WHY DOES NASA REFUSE TO PROVE ITS OWN CASE? WHY IS IT SO IMPORTANT FOR THE PUBLIC TO SIMPLY BELIEVE BELIEVE BELIEVE AND NOT ASK QUESTIONS?

    ReplyDelete
  4. My dad always told me growing up, "We never went to the moon. I never believed that sh*t when it happened." I wasn't born until 1980. He says now, "I'll be dead. Long gone and the truth with come out it never happened." Just my .02 cents! But maybe my dad was just too preocuppied with drag racing his '40 Ford at the time. ha Living a fast life ON the ground.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The moon hoax, just to big and far to many people to contain to sustain silence.

    ReplyDelete

Entertain Me With Your Wealth Of Worthless Knowledge